The first route is TP. It took me more than a hundred years to spend on one East, and it took one year.
broken! Not to mention bad, anyway, I used the connection to a problem, lost to others, he used to be very good! (Well, he bought it for me first.)
Later, the map was cheaper, Mercury was bought, fifty yuan, and it was not used once or twice.
And then later, Youku out of the route, saying no money, I grab one. Well, starting the grab, it took 88, as if it has not yet earned back!
Later on, there were forum posts and Xiaobian's sister sent me a Huawei router (WS832), which has been used until now, and is quite strong.
Some of the latter are also intermittent, such as the K1K2, polar routing, and the latest Binghu routers. There is one more member today - Moto is routed to M1. As a non-technical streaming user, today brings us the evaluation of this router. Well, I understand the rules!
I. Preface: Return of the King? Is your feeling still there?
II. Appearance & Parameters: Feelings can't stand the planned "pit"
Third, experience: simple, simple, really simple!
Fourth, the signal: compare Huawei WS832 (falling waterfall reference)
V. Summary: Positioning is wrong. How long can feelings hold?
Thanks for what is worth buying to provide this evaluation opportunity, thanks to the route to provide evaluation products.
What is feeling? In the speaker's mouth, it may be "blowing leather." It is more of a user's mind. In the 1990s, people who lived in that era may have used Motorola's products: the Bp machine, Telephones, mobile phones, etc. At the end of the 16th year when the M1 route was launched, the major media brushed a round of drafts, probably summarizing the four words: Return of the King! However, here is "Aunt Zhang," and we only look at "not worth it." What are the values ​​and worth? See comments!
So first of all, I would like to thank everyone who is about to appear in this post's comment. The evaluation is not comprehensive and needs your help. Aunt Zhang's comment area is the best product evaluation area.
From the LOGO point of view is with a motorcycle, but in the introduction of the product, not too much about the motorcycle or Lenovo's introduction. From the aspect of news releases of various conferences, this brand cooperation is more like the authorization of a brand. Is it just the authorized brand or what core technology? Let's look out of the box.
The route M1 uses a very conventional product package, which is different from the packaging of many Internet products. The large rigid box, the universal layout design does not have much to recommend. Speaking of the concept of a true 4-antenna, it was also a matter of years ago that Internet companies had fired. Therefore, the product planning is not taken care of, and the marketing orientation of the product begins.
In fact, the overall appearance of packaging, and Huawei unpacking two years ago, there is not much difference, of course, K2 is. The difference is flip, or side open. If you really want to say a detail, this layer of film may be placed on the router, not a general bag, but with a hole, so the packaging is even more tidy.
The accessories are simple, an adapter, and a manual. The front of the product is also seen from a distance of only one MOTO lOGO, after all, for this product, the initial impression of the user's attention is probably the most.
The front is a laser bite flower (introduced by the official), while the arched design pulls into the Eiffel Tower. I can only say that the planning thinking is very strange, and most people may not think of copywriting. The design of the bottom is worth mentioning. From the appearance, a heat treatment is done. The upper part is made of two non-slip foot pads, and the lower part is two raised dots. The range of movement of the four antennas: The angle of the vertical router is 90 degrees outward, and the parallel angle is 180 degrees left and right.
Interface (from left to right): Power, WAN interface*1, LAN interface*4, Reset button. Well, you are not mistaken, there is no USB interface, although I may not need, but if you do not, this is a place that may be criticized! I do not know whether the setting of this position is based on the point of view of little use or cost. If it is the latter, the price of 239 blocks is a little weird.
So, we still look at the parameters:
Route M1 parametersThe details of the parameters were not read. From the characteristics of the products advertised by the official authorities, I have lost four of the six characteristics. Smart Allocation, Parental Control, and APP Management. Which $100 router does not have this feature? Or rather, what can they embody? As for the super signal, each of them said that their network is the strongest, so basically this is equal to not saying. Those who have come to the forefront will also ask you a question: Is the signal strong or not? (Because you didn't say you were low-radiation, many other companies have repeatedly stressed)
So, ah, the planning is to use the way to position the product with head-to-head, thinking may still stay in the era of the motorcycle's flourishing; of course, if it is in that era, these are still quite ridiculous.
The data in front of it relates to professional data. I need to borrow the comments from the Wikipedia and public beta pages. The wrong place, please comment directly pointed out. Of course, use silver to marry me, I also recognize!
The remaining two features:
1, 4T4R, which is the true 4 antenna for product promotion (supports MIMO and Tx-beamforming);
2, 256QAM new generation of regulation technology (TurboQAM technology);
Let me talk about the first point, 4T4R compared to the current market 2T2R equipment, the main role is to expand the coverage, improve the throughput of the uplink and downlink; of course, here also depends on a question, that is your own bandwidth. However, at present, from the perspective of the urine of telecommunications, basically 50M broadband has been opened before giving 100M free. So, in the long run, there is basically no problem with the bandwidth base. Of course, if you can, better equipment is better.
Say the second part, TurboQAM technology. Give a brief introduction about the difference between IEEE 802.11n and IEEE 802.11ac standards. (Content reference: liufanfan007 blog) IEEE 802.11 standard has been multiple versions so far, the current mainstream is IEEE 802.11n, which uses 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequency band, modulation mode is 64-QAM, there are 20MHz and 40MHz two kinds of bandwidth, single The maximum speed of the flow is 72Mbps and 150Mbps respectively; IEEE 802.11ac is the newly introduced standard in recent years. It only uses the 5GHz frequency band, the modulation mode is 256-QAM, and the bandwidth is increased by 80MHz on the basis of 20MHz and 40MHz. There are two kinds of 160MHz, and the maximum single-stream speed is 433Mbps and 867Mbps respectively.
To add, for Huawei just mentioned above, K2, the concept of Gigabit routing here is: 2.4G frequency up to 300Mbps, 5G signal up to 867Mbps, and then added together over 1000Mbps. At the same time, the advantage of 5G signals is that the speed is fast, and the disadvantage is poor wall penetration. Taking my personal use in the home as an example, while opening up 2.4G and 5G, basically my 5G segment is placed in the living room link TV box (the millet box, no network card), the TV box and the router are put together. In a room with a wall, the 5G signal begins to fade significantly. However, at home, my mobile phone will not link the 5G signal, because sometimes it will also give priority to the 5G new number in the room, but because of the partition wall. The reason is usually that the signal experience is not very stable. (Huawei router experience in the past two years)
So, here, M1 can achieve a speed of up to 800Mbps on the 2.4G band, which is a simple and complicated approach from my personal understanding. You can enjoy a fast and stable web experience while not tangling your choices.
Just at home there are still a few routes, the most common is Huawei, never used is K2, just get the hands of the tiger. Here is a brief description of the features.
From the perspective of pricing, K2 is the highest, 399 yuan. However, everyone understands! K2 is cabbage; Huawei currently sells for 249 yuan. The appearance of M1 is similar to that of M1. The difference in configuration is dual-band, with USB, control buttons with several entities (one-key WPS, physical key conditional signal strength, etc.); Bihu’s pricing is 199, and the Internet property is strong. A little, so the experience of APP will be a bit better. Before this, there was a bill.
So, what do you think of the higher face value of these four models? Temporarily, this Eiffel Tower is not mentioned.
Of course, I casually asked about sitting next to the mushroom mother, she blindly selected: Mount route M1.
Basically, the appearance is shown so much, then look at the APP and PC side settings!
Basically, the technical aspects are all covered. Next, we look at some basic interface demonstrations. More depth of the setting, on the one hand, I will not, on the other, I really do not.
It's really easy to experience M1APP. It is simpler to start using Huawei's routers than in 13 years. If you compare the above mentioned Bihu, there is no comparability.
The operation is relatively simple, after you plug in the router you can search to the routing M1 wifi, click the link, open the APP, set a password on the link, basically OK. From the second figure, you can see some basic settings. Basically, the routers with APP now have these functions. I think this may be the reason for the development.
PC experienceConnect the router through the computer, open the browser, you can see the settings page, as follows:
Similar to the APP side, click on Experience now and you will be prompted to set it up. Network selection I chose to get automatically (other ways I would not). Then the figure above is a simple setup procedure.
The PC-side interface is more concise. It may show some more detailed menus in the function.
There is no notebook (passing old driver trouble recommend some light, 5000), the test here can only use my artifact - Huawei Imagination 6S to test. Oh yeah, I used the SE before. The mailing was abnormal last week because of some occasional minor issues. Then I said today that I have changed a new one and mail it over next week! Feeling white for a year!
Also said that the bias, or see the signal:
The floor plan of the decoration, the building area is 120 square meters, the tower, so I estimate that the establishment should be more than 100. Then I just wrote a number. The basic layout and coating are almost the same. Selected ABCDEFG, 7 points. First talk about the link, I was a bit lazy when testing, did not test separately, but the two routers are placed in the same point in the living room, routing M1 link on top of Huawei. Then use wifi analyzer test.
The specific data is as follows:
The blue one is Huawei, and the big red one is the motorcycle route M1.
Measured each point, there will be a slight fluctuation, basically stood for a minute, basically stable after the screenshot. In general, looking at the graph above, the two are similar in terms of signal. However, if we look at the actual experience, I think the signal to route M1 will be better and stable. Explain from two aspects, here, let's look at the G point (well, this is the test point of the G position)
My computer is in this position. In this place, Huawei's signal is weak. Including, at F, there are passengers who have not written in the middle, and the signal is relatively weak. However, the route to M1 is still relatively stable. Then Huawei's Imagination 6S has a function, that is, after leaving home, wifi will automatically be broken, when entering the WiFi range will automatically connect. My home is on the second floor, and the place downstairs is the direction of the FG. There is also a distance of about 6 meters from the road. Basically it is also possible to link to wifi on the road. Therefore, from an experience point of view, the Motorola M1 is still stronger in terms of stability and coverage of wifi.
V. Summary: Positioning is wrong. How long can feelings hold?To say that the positioning is wrong, in fact, want to say this product is largely planned to pit. Why do you say that? Judging from the content of its propaganda page, what are the four antennas, what family control, and what APP controls are these years of publicity selling points? Put in today as a propaganda? Is this product trying to get rural?
What is expensive? It's not that you buy 200 yuan is expensive! Aunt Zhang's recommended router is rarely less than 500 (except K2)! Not worth the reason is that we do not know why the value? Well, to come to a comment, maybe to find a point for planning:
In the past, we talked about the Gigabit algorithm and the problems in actual use. Therefore, as an ordinary user, I think that the most prominent features of the M1 and other Gigabit routers with the same price are here. How can I tell this common point to ordinary users? How to tell coverage and stability to "old drivers"? This is a product promotion that needs to be considered.
Second, since the MOTO card has been hung up, is it just a product LOGO? Where are the advantages of technology? Without a good display, it's easier for people to think that this is just a brand name and a premium for feelings.
As for the Gigabit, USB and so on, let's see how to say it! After all, it is not everyone's need to look at the current situation. As an ordinary user, it may be that one router is easy to use and still does not think about these problems. However, pricing as the first generation of products, in the absence of outstanding advantages, there are obvious flaws under the premise, is not as good, a small amount of cheap mixed word of mouth, leaving behind the foundation of M234567.
1, good signal, wide coverage, and stability;
2, stylish appearance, simple to set;
insufficient:1, high pricing;
2, the interface is not rich enough;
3, smart (APP) experience in general, the function is relatively simple, still need to improve.
the above! Inadequacies, a lot of correcting!
Orange Circular Cable With SAA approval
Application: Those LV Power Cables suitable for power networks, direct burial, outdoors, indoors and in cable ducts, where not subject to mechanical damage may occur.
Standard applied: AS/NZS 5000.1Rated Voltage: 0.6/1kV
Certificates Approvals: SAA
Others: Fire Cable and other property Low Voltage Power Cable can be available
Orange Circular Cable,Circular Cable,Orange Circular Wires,Circular Wires
Shenzhen Bendakang Cables Holding Co., Ltd , https://www.bdkcables.com